Big week for red knights

Big week for the red kinghts ahead as the bid to buy the club enters decision time
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/football/premier_league/manchester_united/article7100838.ece

James salutes the eternal Paul Scholes
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/news-and-comment/james-lawton-eternal-scholes-gives-united-kiss-of-life-1948237.html

Alan Hansen tells us that Liverpool's fans worst nightmare is beating Chelsea to hand us that 19th title, as if we didn't know. But there is no way that Liverpool what turn up on the day, he writes and i believe that. Whether they have got in them to win, who knows.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/leagues/premierleague/manutd/7604067/Alan-Hansen-Gifting-title-No-19-to-Manchester-United-is-Liverpool-fans-nightmare.html

I'm not alone in my low estimation of Mancini, As Patrcik Barclay writes he is not the man to take City forward. As a red i think we are in a win win situation here. If they stick with Mancini for continuity they will have a manager who doesn't seem up to it. But if they get rid, and bring a new man in, they will be back to square one. Will the players get on with the manager and will the new manager rate the players whom he didn't buy. Thy should have stuck with Hughes for at least the season, even if they hadn't have finished in the top four.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/football/premier_league/manchester_city/article7101348.ece

Diouf's brother finds out what the derby is all about.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/leagues/premierleague/manutd/7604615/Manchester-Uniteds-Mame-Biram-Dioufs-brother-attacked-after-crowd-trouble-flares-at-Eastlands.html

Gary Neville is quoted as saying City's attempts to clinch fourth spot didn't enter United's heads, rightfully so, but i can't think of any red fans that it didn't.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/leagues/premierleague/manutd/7606496/Harming-Manchester-Citys-quest-for-fourth-not-an-issue-for-United-says-Gary-Neville.html

John Curtice describes how the electoral map could be about to be blown apart as the Liberal poll surge shakes the tories and the labour party to the core.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/liberal-surge-is-biggest-shock-to-electoral-landscape-for-years-1948193.html

Anatole Kaletsky thinks the lib dems are at the very least as practical as the tories and labour.
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/columnists/article7101427.ece

Will the floodgates open on Wall street now Goldman Sachs has had the governments lawyers set onto it.
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/banking_and_finance/article7101495.ece

Ross Clark writing in the Times thinks not.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article7101358.ece

David Yelland ex of the sun writes that during his time at the Murdoch rag, the lib dems were disregarded completely. He thinks that will still be the case and writes how dangerous that could end up being for the head of news international and sky. A vote for the lib dems is a vote is a vote against Rupert Murdoch, that sounds great to me.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/apr/18/clegg-media-elite-murdoch-lib-dem

Cameron tell us that there will be no turning from the tories and if you want a radical change vote Conservative.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/apr/19/conservatives-david-cameron-big-society-election

The late Elliot Smith